NO ONE LEFT BEHIND: THE FIRST “AIDAGOGY” STRATEGY FOR PIE (PARTNERSHIP IN EDUCATION) COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

  • Esyin CHEW
  • Jiaji YANG
  • Nurul Hazlina NOORDIN
Keywords: assessment & feedback, ai in education, educational robot, neural image captioning

Abstract

There are digital divides for pupils in Southeast Asia, especially in the aspect of AI for assessment and feedback. From digital tools to AI, the related research communities remain solo for delivering educational robots with machine learning capabilities from STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering & Maths) discipline. Huge work has been committed for Educational Technology (EdTech) researchers for a crossed disciplinary effort (STEM with educational theory), including British Council funded PIE for women programme, aiming to bridge the gap and to promote equality. A series of educational robotics projects, e.g. AIdagogy in AF (Assessment & Feedback), acts as academic-led outreach strategy between two universities from UK and Malaysia, for inclusive schools’ trials across the two nations: the UK technology origins from EUREKA Robotics Centre with Robot EUREKA, JD Robots and Robot Xiaolongbao for in-class personalised coding learning with assessment and feedback, coupled with the Malaysia home-built STEM robots by the STEM Lab from University Malaysia Pahang Al-Sultan Abdullah. Action research methods with rapid prototype development were adapted for the work for selected underprivileged communities including Muslim & Christian, and Malaysian & British pupils, in particularly girls. Pilot experiments were conducted in Wales, England and Malaysia for user acceptance with effective results from both students and teachers, as part of a larger scale rolled out between 2022-2029 for the Global PIE for Women programme, this work is a pilot for community learning to other partnering universities in Malaysia, Indonesia, Pakistan and Wales: our work-in-progress and future work are reflected reviewed and enhanced with recommendations for other to reference from.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

A&E Seminar Series. (2011-2024). The HEA Assessment and Feedback Seminars & Symposium 2011-2024 http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/resources/detail/assessment/Assessment_Seminars_2011

https://advance-he.ac.uk/teaching-and-learning/assessment-and-feedback-higher-education

Assessment and Feedback Symposium 2024 | Advance HE

Adams, A., Hartnett, E., and Clough, G. (2015). Turn it on its head! Juxtaposed Learning. Creative Education.

Anwar, S., Bascou, N. A., Menekse, M., & Kardgar, A. (2019). A Systematic Review of Studies on Educational Robotics. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 9(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.7771/2157-9288.1223

Atman Uslu, N., Yavuz, G. Ö., & Koçak Usluel, Y. (2022). A systematic review study on educational robotics and robots. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(9), 5874–5898. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.2023890

Biggam, J., & Mccann, M. (2010) “A Study of Turnitin as an Educational Tool in Student Dissertations”. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 7(1), 44-54.

Chew, E., Ding, S., L., & Rowell, G. (2015). Changing Attitudes in learning and assessment: Cast-off ‘plagiarism detection’ and cast-on self-service assessment for learning. Journal of Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 52(5), 454-463. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2013.832633

Chew, E., Snee, H., & Price, T. (2016). Enhancing international postgraduates' learning experience with online peer assessment & feedback innovation. Innovations in Education & Teaching International, 53(3), 247-259.

Chew, E., & Chua, X.N. (2020). "Robotic Chinese language tutor: personalising progress assessment and feedback or taking over your job?". On the Horizon, 28(3), 113-124. https://doi.org/10.1108/OTH-04-2020-0015

Chew, E., Lee, P. H., & Khan, U. S. (2021). Robot Activist for Interactive Child Rights Education. The International Journal for Social Robotics, 13, 1641-1655. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-021-00751-3

Chew E., et al. (2024). Routledge's CRC Press. Fostering Women's Engagement in STEM Through Education: A Cross-Cultural Academic-Industry Journey. https://www.routledge.com/Fostering-Womens-Engagement-in-STEM-Through-Education-A-Cross-Cultural-Academic-Industry-Journey/AbdulMajeed-Chew/p/book/9781032847177

Elsevier (2022). Research Process: What is Observational Study Design and Types. https://scientific-publishing.webshop.elsevier.com/research-process/observational-study-design-and-types/#:~:text=An%20observational%20study%20is%20when,%27t%2C%20exposed%20to%20it.

Glass, R., D., (2001). ‘On Paulo Freire’s Philosophy of Praxis and the Foundations of Liberation Education’. Educational Researcher, 30(2), 15-25.

Gibbs, G., & Simpson, C. (2004). Conditions under which assessment supports students’ learning. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, 1(1), 3-31.

Gikandi, J. W., Morrow, D., & Davis, N. E. (2011). Online formative assessment in higher education: A review of the literature, Computers and Education, 57(4), 2333-2351.

JISC (2010). Effective Practice with e-Assessment. Available from: https://www.jisc.ac.uk/reports/rethinking-assessment ; http://www.jisc.ac.uk/whatwedo/programmes/elearningpedagogy/assessment.aspx

https://www.jisc.ac.uk/guides/principles-of-good-assessment-and-feedback

(assessed on the 4th of Oct 2024)

JISC (2022). The future of assessment: five principles, five targets for 2025 https://www.jisc.ac.uk/reports/the-future-of-assessment-five-principles-five-targets-for-2025 (assessed on the 8th Oct 2024)

Jones N., Chew, E., Jones, C., & Lau, A. (2009). "Over the worst or at the eye of the storm?". Education + Training, 51(1), 6-22. https://doi.org/10.1108/00400910910931805

Kay, S. (2011). Rethinking feedback in higher education: an assessment for learning perspective, The Higher Education Academy ESCalate, Discussions in Education Series. http://escalate.ac.uk/8410

Knight, S., & Ferrell, G. (2022) Principles of good assessment and feedback https://www.jisc.ac.uk/guides/principles-of-good-assessment-and-feedback

Laurillard, D. (2002). Rethinking University Teaching: A Conversational Framework for the Effective Use of Learning Technologies (2nd ed.), London: Routledge.

Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2010). Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies. Project Report. Centre for Learning Technology, US Department of Education. 4 June 2012 http://www2.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/tech/evidence-based-practices/finalreport.pdf

Mora, M.C., Sancho-Bru, J.L. , Iserte, J.L., & Sánchez, F.T. (2012). An e-assessment approach for evaluation in engineering overcrowded groups. Computers & Education, 59(2), 732–740.

Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199-218.

Noordin, N. H., Mok, R., & Mohamad, I. H. (2022). "UMP STEM Bot as educational kit for robotics and computer programming," in 8th International Conference on Mechatronics Engineering (ICOM 2022), pp. 1-8.

Noordin, N. H., Abdullah, K. K. B. H., & Eu, P. S. (2024). "Assessing the Effectiveness of UMP STEM Cube as a Tool for Developing Digital Making Skill Sets". IEEE Transactions on Education, 1-11.

NUS (2009) The UK National Student Survey. http://www.thestudentsurvey.com/

O’Toole, J., M., & Absalom, D., J. (2003). ‘The Impact of Blended Learning on Student Outcomes: is there Room on the House for two?’ Journal of Educational Media, 28(2-3), 179-190.

Pachler, N., Daly, C., Mor, Y., & Mellar, H. (2010). Formative e-assessment: practitioner cases. Computers and Education, 54(3), 715–721.

Perraton, H. (2000). ‘Choosing Technologies for Education’. Journal of Educational Media, 25(1), 31-38.

PIE (2022-2024) Partnership in Education / Employability / Empowerment (Global Community). https://pie4stemwomen.wixsite.com/pie4stem

Price, M, Handley, K., Millar, J., & O’Donovan, B. (2010). Feedback: all that effort, but what is the effect? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(3), 277–289.

Russel, T. (1999). ‘The No Significant Different Phenomenon.’ Office of Instructional Telecommunication of the CAM, 36(5), 37-41.

Rovai, A., P. (2000). Online and traditional assessments: what is the different? Internet and Higher Education, 3(3), 141-151.

Sadler, D. R. (2010). Beyond feedback: developing student capability in complex appraisal. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 35 (5), 535-550.

Tetta, L., Hounsellb, J., Christiec, H., Creed, V. E., & McCuneb, V. (2012). Learning from feedback? Mature students’ experiences of assessment in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 17(2), 247-260. DOI: 10.1080/13596748.2011.627174

UK Government (2023). AI in Schools: Everything You Need to Know. The Education Hub. https://educationhub.blog.gov.uk/2023/12/06/artificial-intelligence-in-schools-everything-you-need-to-know

Vaughan, N.D., & Garrison, D.R. (2005). Creating Cognitive Presence in a Blended Faculty Development Community. Internet and Higher Education, 8(1), 1-12.

Venable, J. R., Aitken, A., Chang, V., Dreher, H., Issa, T., von Konsky, B., & Wood, L. (2012). Developing a research design for comparative evaluation of marking and feedback support systems. In Creating an inclusive learning environment: Engagement, equity, and retention, Proceedings of the 21st Annual Teaching Learning Forum, 2-3 February 2012. Perth: Murdoch University. http://otl.curtin.edu.au/tlf/tlf2012/refereed/venable.pdf

Walker, R.A. (2010). Sociocultural Issues in Motivation, Editor(s): P. Peterson, E. Baker, B. McGaw,

International Encyclopedia of Education (3rd Edition), Elsevier, 712-717, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-044894-7.00629-1

Yang J, Chew E., & Liu, P. (2021). Service humanoid robotics: a novel interactive system based on bionic-companionship framework. PeerJ Computer Science 7:e674 https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.674

Yang, J. Chew, E., Lee, P. Hu, S., & Wei, H. (in press) ‘Disrupting Healthcare and Educational Services: The First Human-Robot Multimodal-Companionship in 7 Tokku Zones in Wales and Malaysia’, Proceeding of International Conference for Innovation in Biomedical Engineering and Life Science (ICIBEL) 2024, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.

Published
2024-11-01
How to Cite
CHEW, E., YANG, J., & NOORDIN, N. H. (2024). NO ONE LEFT BEHIND: THE FIRST “AIDAGOGY” STRATEGY FOR PIE (PARTNERSHIP IN EDUCATION) COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT. ICCD, 6(1), 475-483. https://doi.org/10.33068/iccd.v6i1.712
Section
Articles