LIVELIHOOD ANALYSIS FOR INFORMAL BUSINESSES: A TOOL TOWARDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INTERVENTION
Abstract
The informal business sector is a marginalized sector that are often left behind in the policy making as a result of their informality nature. However, the government regard the informal sector as a valuable partner in local development since they are considered as unplanned driver of economic growth. Livelihood analysis is used as a tool to understand the weaknesses of their assets, which served as basis for community development intervention. The five livelihood assets include human, social, natural, physical and financial. Due to lack of formal education, the informal food businesses such as street vendors are not capacitated in terms of entrepreneurial skills. The informal nature of the sector is in itself a limiting factor in accessing a wide network of suppliers, industry organizations, market and even livelihood assistance. The absence of financial security has led them to acquire multitude of loans. One of the major constraints in their sector is the lack of a public space that is open for informal food sellers. Since most of the informal business owners rely their stocks from a larger business unit, they are prone to disturbances that affect the supply chain of these groups. With a modest net income gained on a daily basis and considered above the subsistence level, the informal food businesses should have expanded and graduated from its informal status. The long years of period in the sector proved to show that they lack entrepreneurial skills such as innovativeness, creativity and visionary skills of an entrepreneur.
Downloads
References
Aubry, C., & Kebir, L. (2013). Shortening food supply chains: A means for maintaining agriculture close to urban areas? The case of the French metropolitan area of Paris. Food Policy, 41, 85-93.
Ballano, V. O. (2015). The government’s attitude toward the informal sector and piracy.Sociological Perspectives on Media Piracy in the Philippines and Vietnam. Springer-Singapore pp75-115
Baum, J. R., & Locke, E. A. (2004). The relationship of entrepreneurial traits, skill, and motivation to subsequent venture growth. Journal of applied psychology, 89(4), 587.
Hastings, J. S., Madrian, B. C., & Skimmyhorn, W. L. (2013). Financial literacy, financial education, and economic outcomes. Annu. Rev. Econ., 5(1), 347-373.
Kader, R. A., Mohamad, M. R. B., & Ibrahim, A. A. H. C. (2009). Success factors for small rural entrepreneurs under the one-district-one-industry programme in Malaysia. Contemporary Management Research, 5(2).
Krantz, L. (2001). The sustainable livelihood approach to poverty reduction. SIDA. Division for Policy and Socio-Economic Analysis, 44.
Njoroge, R. M. (2013). Relationship between financial literacy and entrepreneurial success in Nairobi County Kenya. Unpublished MBA Project). University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.
Srinivas, H. (14). Reasons why the informal credit market is used by the poor: Policy implications for microcredit programmes in developing countries. GDRC research output.
Statistical update on employment in the informal economy.ILO. June 2012. Available at www.laborst.ilo.org/informal_economy_E.html
Vlajic, J. V. (2015). Vulnerability and robustness of SME supply chains: An empirical study of risk and disturbance management of fresh food processors in a developing market. In R. Bhamra (Ed.), Organisational Resilience: Concepts, Integration, and Practice (pp. 85-102). CRC press, Taylor and Francis.
Vo, Duc Hong and Ly, Thinh Hung. (2014) Measuring the Shadow Economy in the ASEAN Nations: The IMIC Approach. International Journal of Economics and Finance; 6(10)Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education
Webb, J. W., Bruton, G. D., Tihanyi, L., and Ireland, R. D. (2013). Research on entrepreneurship in the informal economy: Framing a research agenda. Journal of Business Venturing, 28(5), 598–614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2012.05.003
Zimmerman, M. A., & Zeitz, G. J. (2002). Beyond survival: Achieving new venture growth by building legitimacy. Academy of management review, 27(3), 414-431.