IMPLEMENTING COMPUTATIONAL THINKING IN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ICT EDUCATION AND EVALUATION USING THE KIRKPATRICK METHOD

  • Reva Ragam SANTIKA Universitas Budi Luhur
  • Jeanie ANNISA Universitas Budi Luhur
Keywords: Computational Thinking, Kirkpatrick, ICT Education, Elementary School

Abstract

The lack of understanding of computational concepts and problem-solving among students who still consider computers merely as tools for gaming and entertainment, along with their limited exposure to computational Thinking, constrains their ability to address problems systematically. Although the 2013 Curriculum emphasizes critical Thinking, basic data analysis, problem-solving, creativity, and innovation, aligned with the computational thinking method, it remains a distinct challenge for students and teachers to integrate it into their teaching. The objective of computational thinking education is to shift the paradigm and introduce students to computational thinking skills, particularly in ICT Education. Testing this method employs the Kirkpatrick method, which demonstrates a significant improvement in students' ability to solve problems with a more systematic and computational approach. Students can comprehend the concepts of decomposition, pattern recognition, abstraction, and algorithm development. This improvement is reflected in their performance on various computer-based problem-solving tasks. The benefits of implementing computational Thinking include students applying computational thinking principles not only in computer-based learning but also in their daily lives, gaining more confidence in facing technology-based challenges.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alfina, A. (2017). Berpikir Komputasional Siswa dalam Menyelesaiakn Masalah yang Berkaitan dengan Aritmetika Sosial Ditinjau dari Gender. SimkiTechsain, 01(04).

Ansari, M. (2020). Pemikiran Komputasi (Computational Thinking) dalam Pemecahan Masalah. Dirasah, 3(1), 111–126.

Badu, S. Q. (2013). Implementasi Evaluasi Model Kirkpatrick Pada Perkuliahan Masalah Nilai Awal Dan Syarat Batas. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan , Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, 102–109.

Bocconi, S., Chioccariello, A., Dettori, G., Ferrari, A., & Engelhardt, K. (2016). Developing Computational Thinking in Compulsory Education.

Maharani, S., Nusantara, T., As’ari, A. R., & Qohar, A. (2020). Computational Thinking Pemecahan Masalah di Abad Ke-21 (Issue December).

Nurhayati, Y. (2018). Penerapan Model Kirkpatrick Untuk Evaluasi Program Diklat Teknis Subtantif Materi Perencanaan Pembelajaran Di Wilayah Kerja Provinsi Kepulauan Riau. Andragogi Jurnal Diklat Teknis, IV(2), 170–187. https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/275133-penerapan-model-kirkpatrick-untuk-evalua-ced0cdda.pdf

Pisani, E. (2013). Indonesian Kids Do not Know How Stupid They Are. ETC: Exploring the Improbable Nation. http://indonesiaetc.com/indonesian-kids-dont-knowhow-stupid-they-are/.

Ribeiro, L. ;dkk. (2013). Computational Thinking: Possibilities and Challenges. IEEE, 978–1–4799. https://doi.org/10.1109/WEIT.2013.32.

Schleicher, A. (2019). PISA 2018 Insights and Interpretations.

Supiarmo, M. G., Hadi, H. S., & Tarmuzi, T. (2022). Studentâ€TMs Computational Thinking Process in Solving PISA Questions in Terms of Problem-Solving Abilities. (Jiml) Journal of Innovative Mathematics Learning, 5(1), 01–11. https://doi.org/10.22460/jiml.v5i1.p01-11

Published
2023-11-27
How to Cite
SANTIKA, R., & ANNISA, J. (2023). IMPLEMENTING COMPUTATIONAL THINKING IN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ICT EDUCATION AND EVALUATION USING THE KIRKPATRICK METHOD. ICCD, 5(1), 652–657. https://doi.org/10.33068/iccd.v5i1.665
Section
Articles